STF's Decision on Ramagem Sparks Backlash from Hugo Motta and Triggers Political Crisis
The Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)'s recent ruling on Alexandre Ramagem (Federal Police chief and ally of former President Bolsonaro) has ignited a new political firestorm. Deputy Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB) has sharply criticized the ruling and fuelled tensions between the judiciary and Congress.
Key Points of the Controversy:
🔹 STF’s Decision: The court ruled against Ramagem in a case involving alleged obstruction of investigations during the Bolsonaro administration, potentially barring him from future public security roles.
🔹 Hugo Motta’s Reaction: The congressman, a Bolsonaro ally, accused the STF of "judicial activism" and targeting conservative figures, vowing to push for legislative countermeasures.
🔹 Broader Fallout: The decision has reignited debates over the separation of powers, with critics claiming the judiciary is overstepping, while supporters argue it’s upholding accountability.
Political Implications:
Bolsonaro’s Circle: Ramagem’s exclusion weakens Bolsonaro’s influence over law enforcement ahead of the 2026 elections.
Congress vs. STF: Motta and allies may escalate efforts to limit judicial powers, deepening institutional conflict.
Public Divide: Protests from both sides are expected, with Bolsonaristas framing this as "persecution" and opponents hailing it as a victory against impunity.
What’s Next?:
Ramagem’s legal team is expected to appeal.
Motta’s faction could propose bills to curb STF authority.
The ruling may energize both pro- and anti-Bolsonaro movements.
